Inland Revenue Board (IRB). General Anti-Avoidance Provision (§ 140 of the Malaysian Income Tax Act, 1967: Power to disregard certain transactions if not deemed arm’s length) and Transactions by Non-Residents (§ 141 of the Malaysian Income Tax Act, 1967: Powers regarding certain transactions by non-residents).
The IRB released the Malaysian Transfer Pricing Guidelines on 2 July 2003 which specify documentation requirements.
The Malaysian Transfer Pricing Guidelines are largely based on the governing standard for transfer pricing, which is the arm’s length principle as established in the OECD guidelines. The IRB respects the general principles of the OECD guidelines.
The IRB accepts CUP, Resale Price, Cost Plus, Profit Split and TNMM. However, the Malaysian Transfer Pricing Guidelines state that the traditional methods are preferred over the profit methods and advise that the profit methods should only be used when the traditional methods cannot be reliably applied or cannot be applied at all.
There are no specific penalties for transfer pricing. However, the existing legislation and penalty structure under the Malaysian Income Tax Act, 1967, are applied. Penalties for transfer pricing adjustments can range from 100% to 300% of the undercharged tax. There are no transfer pricing specific documentation penalties.
A reduction in penalties can be negotiated based on quality of contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation.
Contemporaneous documents pertaining to transfer pricing need not be submitted with the tax return form, but should be made available to the IRB upon request. Al relevant documentation must be in, or translated into, Bahasa Malaysia (the national language) or English. There is no disclosure required on a tax return to indicate that transfer pricing documentation has been prepared.
The IRB has set out a list of information and documentation to be prepared for transfer pricing purposes. This list is neither intended to be exhaustive nor meant to apply to al types of businesses. Instead, taxpayers are advised to maintain information and documentation that are applicable to their circumstances. The list includes:
There is no documentation deadline. However, documentation should be prepared contemporaneously. As tax returns are due for filing to the IRB within seven months after the close of a company’s financial year-end, it is advisable that transfer pricing documentation is prepared before the submission date of the return.
There is a six-year statute of limitations for tax adjustments, and documentation must be kept for seven years. There is no statute of limitations in instances of fraud, willful default or negligence.
Disclosure of arm’s length values is required in the tax return for the following transactions:
The risk of transfer pricing scrutiny during an audit is high. Tax audits are carried out under a self-assessment regime. Every company is expected to be subject to a desk or field audit at least once every five years. With the release of the Malaysian Transfer Pricing Guidelines, greater scrutiny on transfer pricing has been observed in these field audits. Our experience is that every multinational corporation that was audited over the last 12 months was scrutinized on its transfer pricing policy. Since the beginning of 2005, the number of transfer pricing audits and investigation activity by the IRB increased significantly. There is a specific transfer pricing unit in the IRB to handle al transfer pricing audits.
APAs are available upon request. However, at this stage, there are no formal guidelines on APAs, and the IRB has indicated that it wil consider any terms and conditions which are the norm observed in the transfer pricing regimes in other jurisdictions. The IRB is wil ing to accept requests for both unilateral and bilateral APAs. To date, we are not aware that any APA has been concluded.
![]() |
T P India Services | |
Mobile: | +91 - 09701560975 |
Email: | tpindia@transferpricing-india.com |
Contact Us |